More Research Questions: Rebuttal to Bornstein, Langer, and Stickney |
| |
Authors: | Lillian M. Range Sharon Rae Jenkins |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Our Lady of Holy Cross College, New Orleans, USA 2. University of North Texas, Denton, USA
|
| |
Abstract: | Stickney (2010), Bornstein (2010), and Langer (2010) expand the research recommendations for experimental writing research that Range and Jenkins (2010) generated from gender schema, gender role, and socialization theory. Stickney derives research questions from communication and emotion theory. Bornstein and Langer focus on assessment in this paradigm. Bornstein’s multimodal assessment strategy might improve understanding of apparently inconsistent findings, indicate unstudied processes of interest, and show how changing instructions might maximize writing benefits. Langer’s recommendations to examine gender differences in pre/post/and follow-up emotional outcomes, and in subjective, expressive, and physiological indicators of emotion, identify potential new outcome measures in this research. All three commentaries show promise of advancing our understanding of how writing about trauma might help women and men. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|