The use of anatomically detailed dolls in sexual abuse evaluations: The state of the science |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. GD Animal Health, Arnsbergstraat 7, 7418 EZ, Deventer, the Netherlands;2. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, PO Box 80151, 3508 TD, Utrecht, the Netherlands;1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Canada;2. Transportation Services, City of Edmonton, Canada;3. Engineering Services Department, City of St. Albert, Canada;1. The University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Nursing Department of Community Health Outcomes & Systems, 1720 Second Avenue South, Rm 300, Birmingham, AL 35294-1210, USA;2. University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Nursing, 920 Madison Avenue, 10th floor, Memphis, TN 38163, USA;3. School of Nursing, California State University, 441 La Moree Road, San Marcos, CA 92078, USA;4. Center for Forensic Nursing Excellence International, 10624 S Eastern Avenue, A-793, Henderson, NV 89052, USA;5. Synergy, LLC, 207 W, McKay Street Ste A, Carlsbad, NM 88220, USA;6. Eisenhower Medical Center, 39000 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270-3221, USA;1. Stony Brook University School of Medicine, East Setauket, NY, USA;2. New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA;1. Department of Clinical Medicine, Translational Cancer Research Group, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway;2. Department of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromso;3. Department of Pathology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromso, Norway;4. Department of Medical Biology, Translational Cancer Research Group, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway;5. Department of Urology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromso, Norway |
| |
| Abstract: | In child sexual abuse investigations, anatomically detailed dolls (ADDs) are used frequently with the intention of facilitating expression or demonstration in children who do not disclose abuse verbally. We review and critique research that examines the play of nonabused children with ADDs, compares the ADD play of abused children with that of nonabused children, or compares ADD-aided interviews with interviews using other data-gathering methods. We conclude that the APA Council of Representatives' recent statement (February 8, 1991) endorsing the use of ADDs by certain examiners and the current research on this topic are incompatible. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
