The cost-effectiveness of cognitive behavior therapy for borderline personality disorder: results from the BOSCOT trial |
| |
Authors: | Palmer Stephen Davidson Kate Tyrer Peter Gumley Andrew Tata Philip Norrie John Murray Heather Seivewright Helen |
| |
Affiliation: | Centre for Health Economics, University of York. sjp21@york.ac.uk |
| |
Abstract: | Borderline personality disorder places a significant burden on healthcare providers and other agencies. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of cognitive behavior therapy plus treatment as usual compared to treatment as usual alone for patients with borderline personality disorder. The economic analysis was conducted alongside a multi-center, randomized controlled trial. The costs of primary and secondary healthcare utilization, alongside the wider economic costs, were estimated from medical records and patient self-report. The primary outcome measure used was the quality-adjusted life year (QALY), assessed using EuroQol. On average, total costs per patient in the cognitive behavior therapy group were lower than patients receiving usual care alone (-689 pounds sterling), although this group also reported a lower quality of life (-0.11 QALYs). These differences were small and did not approach conventional levels of statistical significance. The use of cognitive therapy for borderline personality disorder does not appear to demonstrate any significant cost-effective advantage based on the results of this study. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|