心理治疗结果的临床显著性分析方法

心理治疗结果研究中，如何对结果测量数据进行统计分析，是非常重要的环节之一。研究者发现，不能简单使用统计显著性来考察心理治疗的结果，因而引入了临床显著性的概念以便更准确地从临床角度考察治疗的情况。在验证临床显著性改变中，西方学者提出了JT法、GLN法、EN法和HA法等统计分析方法，这些方法都试图更准确地分析临床显著性，但在心理治疗结果研究中，这些方法仍然存在概念明确性、标准和数据收集完善性等方面的问题。因此今后的研究应该关注方法的创新或修订，还是关注数据解释是目前西方关于临床显著性分析方法的两大争论。国内也应在心理治疗结果的研究中引入临床显著性分析方法，同时还应考虑效果评价指标的设立和有效测量工具编制的问题，为正确评价心理治疗结果服务，并最终为提高心理治疗效果服务。

The Clinical Significance Methods for Analyzing Psychotherapy Outcomes

It is a key link in the study of psychotherapy outcomes that how to analyze the outcomes measure data. In the course of the study, the researchers found that the statistical significance methods used to were problematic. Therefore the concept of clinical significance was introduced in evaluating treatment efficacy. Western scholars have put forth the JT, GLN, EN and HA to verify the clinical significant change of clients. These methods were trying to afford the accurate information, however some issues still exist in the study of psychotherapy outcomes, such as the clarity of the concept, the integrity of the standards and data collection. Future research should focus on innovating or amending methods, or concern about the data interpretation is the currently two arguments. Our country should fetch in the clinical significance methods in consideration of the establishment of evaluating indicators and measurement tools, in order to evaluate the psychotherapy outcomes correctly and to enhance the efficacy of psychotherapy finally.