A Puzzle About the Agnostic Response to Peer Disagreement |
| |
Authors: | Michele Palmira |
| |
Institution: | 1. COGITO Research Centre in Philosophy, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
|
| |
Abstract: | The paper argues that the view to the effect that one should suspend judgment in the face of a disagreement with a recognised epistemic peer results in a puzzle when applied to disagreements in which one party is agnostic. The puzzle is this: either the agnostic party retains her suspension of judgment, or she suspends it. The former option is discarded by proponents of the agnostic response; the latter leads the agnostic response to undermine itself. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|