Individual Differences in Instructor Attitudes Underlying Maltreatment and Effective Mentoring in Basic Military Training |
| |
Authors: | Laura G. Barron Alan D. Ogle |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Air Force Personnel Center, Strategic Research and Assessment, Joint Base San Antonio-Randolph, Texaslaura.barron@us.af.mil;3. 559th Medical Group, Military Training Consult Service, Air Force Basic Training, Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland, Texas |
| |
Abstract: | U.S. Air Force noncommissioned officers assigned to basic military training instructor (MTI) duty completed measures of attitudes previously linked to sexual harassment and sexual assault in the research literature: (a) attitudes of antipathy toward women (hostile sexism, Glick &; Fiske, 1996 Glick, P., &; Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. 10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), and (b) attitudes favoring authoritarian use of power. Concurrent validation against trainee evaluations of MTIs on broader criteria showed that proauthoritarian attitudes were negatively associated with ratings of MTI effectiveness in mentoring and leadership; additionally, MTIs with stronger attitudes of hostile sexism were more likely reported as engaging in maltreatment of female trainees. These initial results contribute to ongoing understanding of individual differences as relevant to improve screening for a position of authority over the lowest ranking, and potentially most vulnerable military members. Directions for future research and implications for personnel selection and broader cultural changes are discussed. |
| |
Keywords: | authoritarianism hostile sexism personnel selection individual differences |
|
|