Beyond Projection: Specifying the Types of Peer Delinquency Misperception at the Item and Scale Levels

The perceptual inaccuracy in peer delinquency perceptions has been attributed to projection, a hypothesis stating that individuals impute their own delinquency into perceptions of peer delinquency. While logical, projection can truthfully only explain peer delinquency misperception in one specific situation. Moving beyond projection, we propose there are actually four types of misperception. Using dyadic data, misperceptions are assessed at both the item and scale levels. At the item level, projections of delinquency are not the most frequent type of misperception. Scale-level results reveal that most people are inaccurate and tend to mix various types of misperceptions. Although projection is often linked to overestimations of peer delinquency, those who exclusively misperceive through projection mechanisms tend to underperceive peer delinquency in scale-level perceptions. A key finding shared between item- and scale-level results is perceptions of peer non-delinquency are far more accurate than perceptions of peer delinquency, thus posing serious validity concerns with perceptual measures.