Tender feet and high stepping: Soring in the Tennessee walking horse industry

This paper focuses on the role relationships between owners, trainers, judges, and federal inspectors in the Tennessee walking horse industry and the accommodations they reach in responding to pressures each places on the others. The paper deals with the practice of soring, or blistering, to alter the gait of the animal and its continued practice despite outcry from humane groups, other horsemen, and the federal government. Trainers are subjected to enormous pressures to win, which means they believe they must “sore” their animals. Because this practice is illegal, they must act in a manner contrary to legal mandates while giving firm lip service to supporting antisoring guidelines.

The study method involved unfocused interviews with 4 U.S. Department of Agriculture inspectors, 14 trainers, and 8 owners. No notes or recording material of any kind were present during the interviews, although notes were committed to paper immediately afterward. Because the first author has been a horseman for some years, he approached the trainers, the jargon of horsemen being unfamiliar to the general public. Other interviews and trade journals were gleaned by both authors.