An Examination of Happiness, Racism, and Demographics on Judgments of Guilt |
| |
Authors: | Kimberly Dean Julie Holliday Wayne Dan Mack Kecia Thomas |
| |
Affiliation: | University of Georgia |
| |
Abstract: | A policy-capturing study was conducted to evaluate the roles of both plaintiff and defendant race and gender on judgments of criminal guilt in either an assault or a theti case. It was hypothesized that defendant gender and race would affect likelihood of guilt ratings. Moreover, mock jurors' dispositional happiness, scores of modern racism, and race and gender were explored as potential influences on their decision-making policies and judgments. As predicted, strong support was found for the role of defendant gender on judgments of guilt. However, defendant race did not significantly impact guilt ratings. Post hoc analses revealed the importance of race and gender of the victim to juror decisions. In addition, participants' own race and gender played signiticant roles in the decisionmaking policies that were produced. Limitations of the study are discussed. as are topics for future research. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|