Effect of instructions on EMG during the bench press in trained and untrained males |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. School of Medical Imaging, XuZhou Medical College, Xuzhou, China;2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA;3. Civil and Environmental School, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China;1. Department of Information Engineering, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy;2. Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy;3. Rehabilitation Unit, S. Croce Hospital, A.S.L. TO5, Moncalieri (TO), Torino, Italy;1. School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, 200 Lees Avenue, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada;2. School of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Ottawa, 200 Lees Avenue, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada;3. Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 451 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON, Canada |
| |
Abstract: | Strength and rehabilitation professionals strive to emphasize certain muscles used during an exercise and it may be possible to alter muscle recruitment strategies with varying instructions. This study aimed to determine whether resistance trained and untrained males could selectively activate the pectoralis major or triceps brachii during the bench press according to various instructions. This study included 13 trained males (21.5 ± 2.9 years old, 178.7 ± 7.0 cm, 85.7 ± 10.7 kg) and 12 untrained males (20.3 ± 1.6 years old, 178.8 ± 9.4 cm, 74.6 ± 17.3 kg). Participants performed a bench press one-repetition maximum (1-RM) test, 3 uninstructed repetitions at 80% 1-RM and two more sets of three repetitions with instructions to isolate the chest or arm muscles. Electromyography (EMG) was obtained from the pectoralis major, anterior deltoid, and the long head and short head of the triceps brachii. Maximum EMG activity normalized to 1-RM for each muscle was averaged over the three repetitions for each set and compared between the uninstructed, chest-instructed and arm-instructed conditions among the groups. The trained participants had a greater 1-RM (126.2 ± 30.6 kg) than the untrained participants (61.6 ± 14.8 kg) (P < 0.01). EMG activity was not different between the groups for any of the instructions (P > 0.05). When the group data was combined, short head of the triceps activity was significantly lower in the chest instruction (80.1 ± 19.3%) when compared to the uninstructed (85.6 ± 23.3%; P = 0.01) and arm-instructed (86.0 ± 23.2; P = 0.01) conditions. It can be concluded that instructions can affect muscle activation during the bench press, and this is not dependent on training status. |
| |
Keywords: | Muscle activity Strength training Internal focus |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|