首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


The Inducement of Meaningful Work: A Response to Anderson and Weijer
Authors:Email author" target="_blank">Terrence?P?Mc?EachernEmail author
Institution:(1) Senior Research Associate Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza Room 011, Houston, Texas, U.S.A, 77030
Abstract:James A. Anderson and Charles Weijer take the wage payment model proposed by Neil Dickert and Christine Grady and extend the analogy of research participation to unskilled wage labor to include just working conditions. Although noble in its intentions, this moral extension generates unsavory outcomes. Most notably, Anderson and Weijer distinguish between two types of research subjects: occasional and professional. The latter, in this case, receives benefits beyond the moral minima in the form of “the right to meaningful work.” The problem is that meaningful work can itself be a form of inducement, and consequently, may in fact increase the incidence of inducement contrary to the intentions of the wage payment model.
Keywords:clinical trials  ethics  inducement  meaningful work  research subject
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号