On the relevance of folk intuitions: a commentary on Talbot |
| |
| Authors: | Sytsma Justin Machery Edouard |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Department of Philosophy and Humanities, East Tennessee State University, United States;2. Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh, United States;1. CUNY –LaGuardia;1. Haskins Laboratories, 300 George St, Suite 900, New Haven, CT 06511, United States;2. Department of Communication Disorders, Southern Connecticut State University, New Haven, CT, United States;3. Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States;4. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States;5. Yale Child Study Center, New Haven, CT, United States;6. Tottori University, Tottori, Japan;7. University of Connecticut, Department of Psychology, Storrs, CT, United States;8. Department of Linguistics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States;1. Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica, Napoli, Italy;2. Department of Physics “E. Pancini”, University of Naples “Federico II”, Napoli, Italy;3. John Hopkins University Applied Physical Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Road, Laurel, MD 20723, USA;1. Axe Santé des populations et pratiques optimales en santé, CHU de Québec Hôpital de l’Enfant-Jésus, Québec, Québec, Canada;2. Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada;3. Centre d''excellence sur le vieillissement de Québec, Québec, Québec, Canada;4. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California San Francisco-Fresno, Community Regional Medical Center, Fresno, California;6. Department of Emergency Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California |
| |
| Abstract: | In previous work, we presented evidence suggesting that ordinary people do not conceive of subjective experiences as having phenomenal qualities. We then argued that these findings undermine a common justification given for the reality of the hard problem of consciousness. In a thought-provoking article, Talbot has challenged our argument. In this article, we respond to his criticism. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录！ |
|
