计算机、证明和证据(英文) |
| |
引用本文: | 王启义. 计算机、证明和证据(英文)[J]. 逻辑学研究, 2012, 0(1): 50-67 |
| |
作者姓名: | 王启义 |
| |
作者单位: | 香港中文大学哲学系 |
| |
摘 要: | 有论者认为以电脑辅助进行之数学证明其实包含了经验性之前提,因此要接受此类证明,就得修改传统的"数学证明"的概念。本文审视此说法;以讨论Thomas Tymoczko的一篇关于四色定理得哲学意义的论文为发端,进而论及Tyler Burge等人的相关观点,并由此对上述说法提出质疑。
|
关 键 词: | 数学证明 计算机 证据 电脑辅助 四色定理 哲学意义 经验性 审视 概念 论者 |
Computer,Proof,and Testimony |
| |
Affiliation: | Kai-Yee Wong Philosophy Department,The Chinese University of Hong Kong |
| |
Abstract: | It has been claimed that computer-assisted proof utilizes empirical evidence in a manner unheard of in traditional mathematics and therefore its employment forces us to modify our conception of proof.This paper provides a critical survey of some arguments for this claim.It starts by revisiting a well known paper by Thomas Tymoczko on the computer proof of the Four-Color Theorem.Drawing on some ideas from the works of Tyler Burge and others,it then considers a way to see the philosophical significance of computer proof that casts doubts on the claim. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录! |
|