What's wrong with immediate knowledge? |
| |
Authors: | William P Alston |
| |
Institution: | (1) University of Syracuse, Italy |
| |
Abstract: | Immediate knowledge is here construed as true belief that does not owe its status as knowledge to support by other knowledge (or justified belief) of the same subject. The bulk of the paper is devoted to a criticism of attempts to show the impossibility of immediate knowledge. I concentrate on attempts by Wilfrid Sellars and Laurence Bonjour to show that putative immediate knowledge really depends on higher-level knowledge or justified belief about the status of the beliefs involved in the putative immediate knowledge. It is concluded that their arguments are lacking in cogency. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |