Exploring the construct validity of the social cognition and object relations scale in a clinical sample |
| |
Authors: | Stein Michelle B Slavin-Mulford Jenelle Sinclair S Justin Siefert Caleb J Blais Mark A |
| |
Affiliation: | Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Psychological Evaluation and Research Laboratory, One Bowdoin Square, 7th Floor, Boston, MA 02114, USA. mstein3@partners.org |
| |
Abstract: | The Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale-Global rating method (SCORS-G; Stein, Hilsenroth, Slavin-Mulford, & Pinsker, 2011; Westen, 1995) measures the quality of object relations in narrative material. This study employed a multimethod approach to explore the structure and construct validity of the SCORS-G. The Thematic Apperception Test (TAT; Murray, 1943) was administered to 59 patients referred for psychological assessment at a large Northeastern U.S. hospital. The resulting 301 TAT narratives were rated using the SCORS-G method. The 8 SCORS variables were found to have high interrater reliability and good internal consistency. Principal components analysis revealed a 3-component solution with components tapping emotions/affect regulation in relationships, self-image, and aspects of cognition. Next, the construct validity of the SCORS-G components was explored using measures of intellectual and executive functioning, psychopathology, and normal personality. The 3 SCORS-G components showed unique and theoretically meaningful relationships across these broad and diverse psychological measures. This study demonstrates the value of using a standardized scoring method, like the SCORS-G, to reveal the rich and complex nature of narrative material. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|