Truth Approximation, Social Epistemology, and Opinion Dynamics |
| |
Authors: | Igor Douven and Christoph Kelp |
| |
Institution: | (1) Faculty of Philosophy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands;(2) Institute of Philosophy, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium |
| |
Abstract: | This paper highlights some connections between work on truth approximation and work in social epistemology, in particular
work on peer disagreement. In some of the literature on truth approximation, questions have been addressed concerning the
efficiency of research strategies for approximating the truth. So far, social aspects of research strategies have not received
any attention in this context. Recent findings in the field of opinion dynamics suggest that this is a mistake. How scientists
exchange and take into account information about each others’ beliefs may greatly influence the accuracy and speed with which
the scientific community as a whole approximates the truth. On the other hand, social epistemologists concerned with peer
disagreement have so far neglected the question of how practices of responding to disagreements with peers fare with respect
to the goal of approximating the truth. Again, work on opinion dynamics shows that this may be a mistake, and that how we
ought to respond to disagreements with our peers may depend on the specific purposes of our investigations. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|