Wittgenstein, Dreaming and Anti-Realism: A Reply to Richard Scheer |
| |
Authors: | William Child |
| |
Affiliation: | University College, Oxford |
| |
Abstract: | I have argued that Wittgenstein's treatment of dreaming involves a kind of anti-realism about the past: what makes "I dreamed p " true is, roughly, that I wake with the feeling or impression of having dreamed p . Richard Scheer raises three objections. First, that the texts do not support my interpretation. Second, that the anti-realist view of dreaming does not make sense, so cannot be Wittgenstein's view. Third, that the anti-realist view leaves it a mystery why someone who reports having dreamed such-and-such is inclined to report what she does. The Reply defends my reading of Wittgenstein against these objections. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|