Resolutions to interpretive dilemmas created by the minnesota multiphasic personality inventory 2 (MMPI-2): A reply to Strassberg

We discuss the interpretive dilemmas identified by Strassberg (1991) and propose to resolve these dilemmas by pointing out that some change has indeed been introduced in the MMPI-2 and that change is a necessary requisite for improvement. Changes in administration procedures used with the MMPI-2 normative sample should only improve the quality of the normative data; changes in the way T-scores were developed lead to minimal change in the profile but enable more accurate interpretation of differences between scales on an individual's profile; normative changes have a differential effect on the clinical scales and this is to be expected; and the problem of codetype congruence has been overestimated and overstated. We conclude that the change introduced in the MMPI-2 can only serve to improve the test.