Organizing Components into Combinations: How Stage Transition Works |
| |
Authors: | Michael Lamport Commons Francis Asbury Richards |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Education, Harvard Medical School, Rhode Island;(2) Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Mental Health Center, Boston, Massachusetts |
| |
Abstract: | This paper investigates the nature of transition between stages. The Model of Hierarchical Complexity of tasks leads to a quantal notion of stage, and therefore delineates the nature of stage transition. Piaget's dialectical model of stage change was extended and precisely specified. Transition behavior was shown to consist of alternations in previous-stage behavior. As transition proceeded, the alternations increased in rate until the previous stage behaviors were “smashed” together. Once the smashed-together pieces became coordinated, new-stage behavior could be said to have formed. Because stage transition is quantal, individuals can only change performance by whole stage. We reviewed theories of the specific means by which new-stage behavior may be acquired and the emotions and personalities associated with steps in transition. Contemporary challenges in the society increasingly call for transition to postformal and postconventional responses on the part of both individuals and institutions as the examples illustrate. |
| |
Keywords: | stage transition steps in transition component actions combination actions transition processes |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|