首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

简明心境量表(POMS)在中国的试用报告
引用本文:王建平,林文娟,陈仲庚,崔俊南,刘杰.简明心境量表(POMS)在中国的试用报告[J].心理学报,2000,32(1):110-114.
作者姓名:王建平  林文娟  陈仲庚  崔俊南  刘杰
作者单位:中国科学院心理研究所!北京100101,中国科学院心理研究所!北京100101,北京大学,新疆医学院,新疆公路设计院医务室
基金项目:国家自然科学基金!39770265
摘    要:该研究引进POMS,采用随机对照的方法将289名放化疗病人分成实验组和对照组,分别在治疗前中后测查三次,同时测查385名正常人,以验证其在中国大陆的适用情况。研究发现:POMS各量表同质性信度高,三种方法检验的临床效度均较高,尤其是对心理干预的效果更敏感;但该问卷的区分效度不高,对正常人心境变化的敏感性不如对病人。由此得出,POMS在中国大陆癌症病人中是可行的、可靠的、有效的和敏感的,可作为心理干预的一个敏感指标。

关 键 词:POMS  信度  效度  癌症病人  
修稿时间:1998-12-25

POMS FOR USE IN CHINA
Wang Jianping ,Lin Wenjuan Chen Zhonggeng.POMS FOR USE IN CHINA[J].Acta Psychologica Sinica,2000,32(1):110-114.
Authors:Wang Jianping  Lin Wenjuan Chen Zhonggeng
Institution:Wang Jianping ,Lin Wenjuan ;(Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101);Chen Zhonggeng ;(Beijing University, Beijing 100871)
Abstract:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the POMS used in China. 289 cancer patients in fourhospitals were randomly assigned to one of either experimental or control group, measured three times(pre-, on- and post-treatment), and one time for normal people. The major results were:there werehigher levels of homogeneity reliability and clinical validity tested by three ways, in all scales of POMS,especially sensitive to the effect of psychological intervention. But, the discriminant validity of POMSwas not strong, and the sensitivity to the changes of mood states was weaker in normal people than incancer patients. These results supported the POMS as a reliable, responsive, and valid measure of themood states, and a sensitive indicator to psychological intervention of cancer patients in China.
Keywords:POMS  reliability  validity  cancer patient  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《心理学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《心理学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号