首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

幼儿反事实推理的错误源分析
引用本文:张坤.幼儿反事实推理的错误源分析[J].心理发展与教育,2007,23(1):6-9.
作者姓名:张坤
作者单位:华东政法学院社会学系, 上海, 201620
摘    要:本研究选取57名3~5岁幼儿,考察了在两种选择和三种选择的反事实推理任务中儿童的表现以及是否出现现实错误。结果如下:无论在两种还是三种选择的反事实任务中,3岁组儿童的得分显著低于4岁和5岁组儿童,而4岁和5岁组儿童之间不存在显著差异;幼儿在反事实推理中的确会出现现实错误,但除此之外,幼儿在三种选择任务中也会选择现实和正确答案之外的第三个选项。由此可见,年幼儿童可能在抑制现实和建构反事实替代情境方面都存在困难,这尚需我们进一步探究。

关 键 词:幼儿  反事实思维  现实错误  
文章编号:23684282

The Analysis of Children's Errors in Counterfactual Reasoning
ZHANG Kun.The Analysis of Children''''s Errors in Counterfactual Reasoning[J].Psychological Development and Education,2007,23(1):6-9.
Authors:ZHANG Kun
Institution:Department of Sociology, East China University of Politics and Law, Shanghai 201620
Abstract:57 children aged 3 to 5 years were used as subjects to explore the performances of children in counterfactual reasoning and to explore if they made realististic errors.The result indicated that there was significant age difference in both 2-choice counterfactual task and 3-choice counterfactual tasks.Young children indeed made realistic errors in counterfactual reasoning.But they also chose the third location as their answers in 3-choice task.
Keywords:kindergarten children  counterfactual reasoning  realististic errors
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《心理发展与教育》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《心理发展与教育》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号