Visual field differences in recognizing letters

Differences due to visual field location were examined for single letters placed at one of 12 clockface positions 3° and 6° from fixation. Results compared closely with established findings using simple light stimuli, showing best recognition on the horizontal meridian, poorest on the vertical and intermediate on oblique meridians. Subjects’ confidence ratings followed the same pattern. There was evidence for a specific right superiority along the horizontal meridian, as found in previous studies, but no evidence for a general right hemifield superiority. The difficulty of arguing from these findings to available dominance or scanning explanations is pointed out. It is proposed that effects due to visual field variability may have a pervasive yet largely unrecognized influence in visual perception research.