用公评审稿促进中国科技期刊的快速发展

学术论文评价目前普遍采用的同行评审系统,存在严重缺陷,在我国具体国情下,不易保证审稿过程的公正性,难以有效提高科研群体的审稿水平。作者提出一个“公评审稿”方案,包括实名的公开推荐和匿名的公开评审两个过程,使学术成果的发表和评价实现了清晰的功能分离,解决了发表注重快速及时、而评价注重慎重仔细这一根本矛盾。公评系统融合了中国传统的举贤制度和互联网新近发展的微博技术,其公开和共享理念,在保证学术公正的同时,能大幅度促进科研知识和经验在科研群体内的传播,迅速、有效地提高我国科技期刊的办刊质量。

Promoting the Rapid Growth of Chinese Science Journals with the Open-Review System

The common peer review system in academic paper assessment is seriously deficient, making it difficult to ensure fair reviews and to enhance review quality of the research population under the current situation in China. An "Open-Review" system is proposed consisting of a public recommendation stage and an open, anonymous critical review stage. The system dissociates the publication and evaluation of research papers, which are two functions with conflicting requirements. Combining the traditional Chinese wisdom "Nomination of the competent" and the most current internet technology microblog, the openness and resource-sharing rationale of the new system, while ensuring fairness in academic review, can effectively help the propagation of knowledge and experience among the scientific community, and quickly promote the growth of Chinese science journals.