首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Modeling Interactions Between Latent Variables in Research on Type D Personality: A Monte Carlo Simulation and Clinical Study of Depression and Anxiety
Authors:Paul Lodder  Johan Denollet  Wilco H. M. Emons  Giesje Nefs  Frans Pouwer  Jane Speight
Affiliation:1. CoRPS-Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic diseases, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, The Netherlands;2. Department of Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg University, The Netherlands;3. p.lodder@uvt.nl;5. Department of Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg University, The Netherlands;6. "ORCIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8772-740X;7. Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark;8. STENO Diabetes Center Odense, Odense, Denmark;9. "ORCIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8172-9818;10. School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia;11. The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Melbourne, Australia;12. AHP Research, Hornchurch, UK"ORCIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1204-6896
Abstract:Several approaches exist to model interactions between latent variables. However, it is unclear how these perform when item scores are skewed and ordinal. Research on Type D personality serves as a good case study for that matter. In Study 1, we fitted a multivariate interaction model to predict depression and anxiety with Type D personality, operationalized as an interaction between its two subcomponents negative affectivity (NA) and social inhibition (SI). We constructed this interaction according to four approaches: (1) sum score product; (2) single product indicator; (3) matched product indicators; and (4) latent moderated structural equations (LMS). In Study 2, we compared these interaction models in a simulation study by assessing for each method the bias and precision of the estimated interaction effect under varying conditions. In Study 1, all methods showed a significant Type D effect on both depression and anxiety, although this effect diminished after including the NA and SI quadratic effects. Study 2 showed that the LMS approach performed best with respect to minimizing bias and maximizing power, even when item scores were ordinal and skewed. However, when latent traits were skewed LMS resulted in more false-positive conclusions, while the Matched PI approach adequately controlled the false-positive rate.
Keywords:Latent prediction model  structural equation modeling  SEM  latent interaction  nonnormality  Type D personality  depression  anxiety
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号