| 关于功利、理性或关怀--不同理论在评价人类基因组研究中的差异 |
| |
| 引用本文： | RuthGroenhout 张斌. 关于功利、理性或关怀--不同理论在评价人类基因组研究中的差异[J]. 医学与哲学(人文社会医学版), 2004, 25(4): 2-3 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | RuthGroenhout 张斌 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 美国加尔文大学,大瀑布城,MI 49546,USA |
| |
| 摘 要： | 从功利主义的角度审视治疗性克隆,治疗性克隆研究能够为人类造福,是可以得到辩护的.义务论认为,胚胎不能作为试验的客体,反对治疗性克隆研究.而关怀理论学家则不支持治疗性克隆研究.
|
| 关 键 词： | 功利主义 义务论 关怀 治疗性克隆 |
Utility,Reason Or Care:The Difference Theory Makes in Evaluations of Human Genome Research |
| |
| Ruth Groenhout. Utility,Reason Or Care:The Difference Theory Makes in Evaluations of Human Genome Research[J]. Medicine & Philosophy:Humanistic & Social Medicine Edition, 2004, 25(4): 2-3 |
| |
| Authors: | Ruth Groenhout |
| |
| Abstract: | To examine therapeutic cloning from a utilitarian perspective,therapeutic cloning research is eminently defensible on utilitarian grounds because of the potential for benefit.From a deontological perspective,embroys cannot be treated as objects of experimentation,one must oppose therapeutic cloning. Care theorists don't support therapeutic cloning. |
| |
| Keywords: | utilitarian deontology care therapeutic cloning |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
