Comparison of pedestrian behaviors between drivers and non-drivers in Chinese sample |
| |
| Institution: | 1. CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing, China;2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China;3. Institute of Aviation Medicine, Air Force, Beijing, China;1. National United Engineering Laboratory of Integrated and Intelligent Transportation, School of Transportation and Logistics, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China;2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, USA;1. Department of Traffic Psychology, Nantong University, 9 Seyuan Road, Nantong, Jiangsu Province 226019, China;2. Department of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1300 University Blvd, CH 415, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA;1. Transport and Logistics Group, Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Jaffalan 5, Building 31, Delft 2628 BX, Netherlands;2. Laboratory of Innovations in Transportation (LITrans), Department of Civil Engineering, Ryerson University, Canada Research Chair, Disruptive Transportation Technologies and Services, 341 Church Street, Toronto (ON) M5B 2M2, Canada;1. CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing, China;2. Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China;3. School of Psychology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi''an, China;1. University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain;2. Heltzen – Basque Foundation for Road Safety, Spain;3. Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA |
| |
| Abstract: | Road safety is a serious problem worldwide. Pedestrians, as the most vulnerable road users, deserve more attention. The aims of this study were to examine the validity of the Chinese version of the pedestrian behavior scale (CPBS) in both driver and non-driver samples, and to compare pedestrian behaviors between the two samples. In addition, we assessed the association of attention with pedestrian behaviors by exploring the relationships among CPBS, Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) and Attention-Related Cognitive Errors Scale (ARCES). Two groups were assessed, including 302 members in the population with driving experience and 307 individuals in the non-driver group without driving experience. All participants completed the CPBS, MAAS, and ARCES, and provided sociodemographic parameters. The results showed that the CPBS had acceptable internal consistency and stability structure. More importantly, pedestrian behaviors were significantly different between drivers and non-drivers. Drivers reported significantly less transgressive and aggressive behaviors compared with non-drivers. As for the relationship between attention and pedestrian behavior, the MAAS score showed a significant negative correlation with aggressive behavior in the CPBS among drivers, while the ARCES score had significant positive correlations with all three CPBS factors. In non-drivers, the MAAS score was negatively correlated with aggressive behavior and positively associated with positive behavior; the ARCES score was positively correlated with aggressive behavior. |
| |
| Keywords: | Pedestrian behavior Driver Non-driver Attention-related cognitive errors Mindful attention awareness |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
