首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


A note on aggregating opinions
Affiliation:1. Universidad de Granada, Spain;2. Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Spain;1. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences College of Pharmacy, Little Rock, Arkansas;2. Wingate University School of Pharmacy, Wingate, North Carolina;3. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Office of Educational Development, Little Rock, Arkansas;4. Sullivan University College of Pharmacy, Louisville, Kentucky
Abstract:This note examines the number of experts to be included in a prediction group where the criterion of predictive ability is the correlation between the uncertain event and the mean judgment of the group members. It is shown that groups containing between 8 and 12 members have predictive ability close to the “optimum” under a wide range of circumstances but provided (1) mean intercorrelation of experts' opinions is not low (<.3, approximately) and/or (2) mean expert validity does not exceed mean intercorrelation. Evidence indicates these exceptions will not be common in practice. The characteristics needed by an additional expert to increase the validity of an existing group are also derived.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号