Adaptors and Innovators: Preference for Educational Procedures

We tested the hypothesis that differences in attitudes toward conflicting procedures would depend on the context of the presentation and an individual's cognitive style. Data from 182 British school teachers who completed the Kirton (1976) Adaption–Innovation Inventory and two questionnaires concerned with aspects of educational procedures provided results broadly in line with expected adaption–innovation theory. Innovators were found to have a preference for procedures loose in structure, with aims not easily defined, and without easy methods of assessment. The adaptors showed a preference for procedures containing a tighter structure, more definable aims and more precise methods of assessment. The data also provide useful additional norms and information on teachers' cognitive style differences with regard to subject taught, gender, and length of service.