The Interrater Reliability of Elizur's Hostility Systems and Holt's Aggression Variables: A Meta-Analytical Review

TAT performances of mathematicians, creative writers and physicians were compared by means of Pine's (1960) system for rating amount, integration, and directness of drive expression; and also in terms of expression of affect. Writers were most expressive, followed by mathematicians and then physicians. Mathematicians relied relatively heavily upon use of direct, socialized forms of drive content, while physicians emphasized indirect or disguised forms more than other Ss. These emphases appeared to have defensive and integrative functions, as did the physicians' generally suppressive style. The writers showed no comparable emphases on direct or indirect expression. There were no inter-group differences in overall adjustment Pine's scoring system appears to have considerable potential for comparisons of this kind.