Advice for Plagiarism Whistleblowers |
| |
Authors: | Mark Fox Jeffrey Beall |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Judd Leighton School of Business &2. Economics, Indiana University South Bend;3. Auraria Library, University of Colorado Denver |
| |
Abstract: | Scholarly open-access publishing has made it easier for researchers to discover and report academic misconduct such as plagiarism. However, as the website Retraction Watch shows, plagiarism is by no means limited to open-access journals. Moreover, various web-based services provide plagiarism detection software, facilitating one’s ability to detect pirated content. Upon discovering plagiarism, some are compelled to report it, but being a plagiarism whistleblower is inherently stressful and can leave one vulnerable to criticism and retaliation by colleagues and others (Anderson, 1993; Cabral-Cardoso, 2004). Reporting plagiarism can also draw the threat of legal action. This article draws upon our experiences as plagiarism whistleblowers with several goals in mind: to help would-be whistleblowers be better prepared for making well-founded allegations, to give whistleblowers some idea of what they can expect when reporting plagiarism, and to give suggestions for reducing whistleblowers’ vulnerability to threats and stress. |
| |
Keywords: | plagiarism whistleblowing retaliation academic misconduct |
|
|