Students Reported for Cheating Explain What They Think Would Have Stopped Them |
| |
Authors: | Eric M. Beasley |
| |
Affiliation: | Office of the Associate Provost for Undergraduate Education, Michigan State University |
| |
Abstract: | I analyzed 298 open-ended responses of undergraduate students who have been reported for cheating to the question, “What, if anything, would have stopped you from committing your act of academic dishonesty?” These responses included a few major themes: students pled ignorance of what constitutes academic dishonesty and the consequences/seriousness associated with violations; students tended to deflect blame, usually by saying that their professor could have done something differently (neutralization); students did not feel they had enough time, resources, and/or skills to get the desired result without taking responsibility for this lack of time, resources, and/or skills (strain); students felt they did not manage their time well with accepting the blame for the poor time management; and that a bad grade was not an option. These data and results are discussed in relation to the extant literature on the topic. |
| |
Keywords: | academic dishonesty cheating deviance neutralization strain |
|
|