IF Modal Logic and Classical Negation |
| |
Authors: | Tero Tulenheimo |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. CNRS Research Unit “Savoirs, Textes, Langage”, Lille, France, Department of Philosophy, University of Lille 3, Domaine Universitaire du “Pont de Bois”, B.P. 149, 59653, Villeneuve d’Ascq, France
|
| |
Abstract: | The present paper provides novel results on the model theory of Independence friendly modal logic. We concentrate on its particularly well-behaved fragment that was introduced in Tulenheimo and Sevenster (Advances in Modal Logic, 2006). Here we refer to this fragment as ‘Simple IF modal logic’ (IFML s ). A model-theoretic criterion is presented which serves to tell when a formula of IFML s is not equivalent to any formula of basic modal logic (ML). We generalize the notion of bisimulation familiar from ML; the resulting asymmetric simulation concept is used to prove that IFML s is not closed under complementation. In fact we obtain a much stronger result: the only IFML s formulas admitting their classical negation to be expressed in IFML s itself are those whose truth-condition is in fact expressible in ML. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|