Hippocampal and extrahippocampal systems compete for control of contextual fear: Role of ventral subiculum and amygdala

Two neural systems, a hippocampal system and an extrahippocampal system compete for control over contextual fear, and the hippocampal system normally dominates. Our experiments reveal that output provided by the ventral subiculum is critical for the hippocampal system to win this competition. Bilateral electrolytic lesions of the ventral subiculum after conditioning, but not before conditioning, impaired contextual fear conditioning. Reversibly inactivating this region by bilateral injections of muscimol produced the same results—no impairment when the injection occurred prior to conditioning but a significant impairment when this region was inactivated after conditioning. Thus, the extrahippocampal system can support contextual fear conditioning if the ventral subiculum is disabled before conditioning but not if it is disabled after conditioning. Our experiments also reveal that the basolateral region of the amygdala (BLA) is where the two systems compete for associative control of the fear system. To test this hypothesis we reasoned that the extrahippocampal system would also acquire associative control over the fear system, even if the hippocampal system were functional, if the basal level of plasticity potential in the BLA could be increased. We did this by injecting the D1 dopamine agonist, {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"SKF82958","term_id":"1156217255","term_text":"SKF82958"}}SKF82958, into the BLA just prior to conditioning. This treatment resulted in a significant increase in freezing when the ventral subiculum was disabled prior to the test. These results are discussed in relationship to the idea that D1 agonists increase plasticity potential by increasing the pool of available extrasynaptic GluR1 receptors in the population of neurons supporting acquired fear.It is generally believed that contextual fear conditioning depends on the hippocampus. However, it is now clear that an extrahippocampal system exists that can also support contextual fear conditioning. The last statement is based on the fact that damage to the hippocampus prior to conditioning has a minor impact on contextual fear (Maren et al. 1997; Frankland et al. 1998; Cho et al. 1999; Wiltgen et al. 2006). In fact, the conclusion that the hippocampus is normally involved in contextual fear conditioning is now based primarily on the finding that damage to the hippocampus after conditioning greatly impairs fear to the context in which conditioning occurs (Maren et al. 1997; Frankland et al. 1998; Anagnostaras et al. 1999; Bannerman et al. 1999; Richmond et al. 1999; Fanselow 2000; Rudy et al. 2004; Wiltgen et al. 2006).Maren et al. (1997) were the first to appreciate the implications of this set of findings. Specifically, they proposed that (1) in the normal animal there is competition between the hippocampal system and an extrahippocampal system for support of contextual fear conditioning, and (2) the hippocampal system normally dominates the extrahippocampal system—preventing it from acquiring the information needed to support fear to the context. This competition hypothesis provides a reasonable account of the lesion data. If the hippocampus is damaged prior to conditioning, then the extrahippocampal system will be able to acquire control over the fear system and generate a fear response at the time of testing. However, if the hippocampal system is functional during conditioning, it will (1) acquire control of the fear system, and (2) prevent the acquisition of control by the extrahippocampal system. Thus, if the hippocampal system is damaged after conditioning, the expression of contextual fear will be impaired, because the information that was acquired by the hippocampal system will not be available and the extrahippocampal system never acquired the relevant information.Maren et al.''s competition hypothesis is accepted by a number of other researchers (Wiltgen and Fanselow 2003; Rudy et al. 2004; Driscoll et al. 2005; Wiltgen et al. 2006). Nevertheless, very little is known about the mediators of this competition. The experiments in this study were aimed at filling some of the gaps in our knowledge of the neural basis of this competition. They are organized around two hypotheses:

• The ability of the hippocampal system to dominate the extrahippocampal system depends on information it provides through the ventral subiculum, a major output region of the hippocampus.
• The locus of the competition is the basolateral region of the amygdala (BLA), which is thought to be critical to the acquisition of conditioned fear and is where information from the hippocampal and extrahippocampal system can converge.