首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

面试预测效度和构想效度研究述评
引用本文:田效勋,车宏生. 面试预测效度和构想效度研究述评[J]. 心理科学进展, 2009, 17(4): 870-876. DOI:  
作者姓名:田效勋  车宏生
作者单位:北京师范大学心理学院,北京 100875
摘    要:面试是人才甄选中最常用的测量工具。大量研究证实,面试的预测效度比较理想,但不同类型面试的预测效度存在差异。虽然能够证实面试的预测效度较好,但对面试的测量构想却知之甚少。研究面试的构想效度,对于提高面试的递增效度有着重要的实践价值。相对人格成分而言,以往研究对面试能够测量到认知成分形成了更加一致地认识。

关 键 词:面试  预测效度  构想效度  递增效度  
收稿时间:2008-04-15

The Commentary of the Research of the Predictive Validity and Construct Validity of Interview
TIAN Xiao-Xun,CHE Hong-Sheng. The Commentary of the Research of the Predictive Validity and Construct Validity of Interview[J]. Advances In Psychological Science, 2009, 17(4): 870-876. DOI:  
Authors:TIAN Xiao-Xun  CHE Hong-Sheng
Affiliation:School of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
Abstract:Interview is the most widely used measurement tool in human resources selection. A large quantity of studies have confirmed that interview had an ideal predictive validity which varied from different types of interview. Though the predictive validity of interview has been confirmed, we still have not much idea about which constructs being measured by interview. It does have some practical value to enhance the incremental validity by studying the construct validity of interview. Compare to measuring the personality components, previous studies on interview had a more coherent understanding of measuring the cognitive components.
Keywords:interview  predictive validity  construct validity  incremental validity
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《心理科学进展》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《心理科学进展》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号