审美主体与伦理主体的比较研究

本文通过对审美主体和伦理主体的比较研究揭示了个体存在的伦理层面的含义。首先考察了老庄和海德格尔的后现代宗教式的主体和儒家形而上的宗教主体，以及儒家就伦理问题对于老庄的挑战。结论是他们都缺乏把他者的生存作为自己的绝对的责任的伦理含义，因而是审美主体：其次，通过对于环境主体和伦理主体及审美主体的关系的讨论，阐释了这样一个哲学基本问题：伦理存在必须以有限性存在为前提；而后者只是一个哲学的抽象。片面地强调人的有限性(尼采)，片面强调有限存在与超越者的关系(老庄和海德格尔)，或否认人的有限性，这些观点都忽略了人在这个世界上的伦理责任。后现代伦理学是指我，作为一个个体(me)，对于他者的一切负有不可推卸的责任。

A Comparative Study of Aesthetic Subjects and Ethical Subjects

In this paper I argue that the ethical dimension of the human existence must presuppose the finitude of human beings; and human finitude in itself should be understood as an abstraction. And in the relation of a finite being to the infinite without the content of the ethical responsibility, the religious subject is also an aesthetic subject. In postmodern ethics, the subject, as a me, refers to the one who cannot be replaced in his or her responsibility to others.