首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Meaning and Method in the Social Sciences1
Authors:WILLIAM?P.?FISHER  Suffix"  >Jr.  author-information"  >  author-information__contact u-icon-before"  >  mailto:wfisher@lexile.com"   title="  wfisher@lexile.com"   itemprop="  email"   data-track="  click"   data-track-action="  Email author"   data-track-label="  "  >Email author
Affiliation:(1) MetaMetrics, Inc., 1000 Park 40 Plaza, Suite 120, Durham, NC 27713, U.S.A.
Abstract:Academia’s mathematical metaphysics are briefly explored en route to an elaboration of the qualitatively rigorous requirements underpinning the calibration and unambiguous interpretation of quantitative instrumentation in any science. Of particular interest are Gadamer’s emphases on number as the paradigm of the noetic, on the role of play in interpretation, and on Hegel’s sense of method as the activity of the thing itself that thought experiences. These point toward and overlap with (1) Latour’s study of the metrological social networks through which technological phenomena are brought into language as modes of being that can be understood, and (2) the way that Rasch’s models for measurement comprise a potential beginning for metaphysically astute, qualitatively and quantitatively integrated, mathematical methods in the social sciences. The paper closes with observations on the general problem that is philosophy, the need to remain open to multiplicities of meaning even as clear understandings are sought and obtained.
Keywords:Gadamer  Hans-Georg  metaphysics  metrology  Rasch models  quantitative methodologies
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号