首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


No compelling evidence for a bilingual advantage in switching or that frequent language switching reduces switch cost
Authors:Kenneth R Paap  Hunter A Myuz  Regina T Anders  Morgan F Bockelman  Roman Mikulinsky  Oliver M Sawi
Institution:1. Department of Psychology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA, USA;2. Department of Psychology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, USA;3. Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
Abstract:Participants completed three cued-switching tasks, responded to two category-fluency probes, two letter-fluency probes, and two probes to alternate between two targets. Correlations across the three cued-switching tasks were significant for both switching costs and mixing costs. The bilingual advantage hypothesis was tested both by forming language groups and treating bilingualism as a continuous variable. No bilingual advantages were observed. In verbal-fluency monolinguals generated more correct responses but the bilingual disadvantage on the category task was not reduced in the letter-fluency scores. The bilingual disadvantage was eliminated when the groups were matched on vocabulary size. The verbal-fluency measures obtained when participants alternated between targets weakly correlated with the switching-costs obtained in the cued-switching tasks.
Keywords:Language switching  executive function  bilingualism  switching cost  verbal fluency
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号