首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


The specificity triad: notions of disease and therapeutic specificity in biomedical reasoning
Authors:Shai?Mulinari  author-information"  >  author-information__contact u-icon-before"  >  mailto:shai.mulinari@soc.lu.se"   title="  shai.mulinari@soc.lu.se"   itemprop="  email"   data-track="  click"   data-track-action="  Email author"   data-track-label="  "  >Email author
Affiliation:1.Department of Sociology,Faculty of Social Sciences, Lund University,Lund,Sweden;2.Department of Clinical Sciences,Unit of Social Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University,Malm?,Sweden
Abstract:Biomedicine is typically defined as the branch of medicine that is based on the principles of biology and biochemistry. A central tenet for biomedicine is the notion of disease and therapeutic specificity, i.e. the idea of tailored treatments for discrete disorders underpinned by specific pathologies. The present paper is concerned with how notions of disease and therapeutic specificity guide biomedical reasoning. To that end, the author proposes a model – the specificity triad – that draws on late philosopher and physician Ludwik Fleck’s concept of “style of thought” to offer a frame for investigating the intricate process through which links between disorders, mechanisms, and therapeutics are established by biomedicine. Next by applying the specificity triad model to scrutinize research efforts in two discrete areas of medicine—psychiatry and regenerative medicine—this paper seeks to stimulate pertinent discussions in and about biomedicine. These include discussions on the ambiguous epistemic status of psychiatry within contemporary biomedicine, as well as the relationship between developmental biology — historically relatively disjointed from biomedical enterprise — and the burgeoning field of regenerative medicine.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号