首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

SCI,不能没,不能唯——以广州医科大学为例
引用本文:张亚莉. 2014. SCI,不能没,不能唯——以广州医科大学为例. 医学与哲学, 35(10A): 8-11.
作者姓名:张亚莉
作者单位:广州医科大学图书馆 广东广州 510182
摘    要:研究了广州医科大学2004年~2014年的SCI论文总量、总被引频次、篇均被引量、论文被引率、高被引论文、热门论文等数据。结果发现,广州医科大学近10年SCI论文总数大幅上升,但篇均被引频次偏低;"沉睡"论文较多,高被引论文和热门论文较少,尖端成果少。提出"不能没SCI",但要正确使用SCI,学术评价应该由重"收录"向重"引用"转变;应引入分学科、分层评估的机制,鼓励发表高水平论文。同时提出"不能唯SCI",以该校人才评估的两个案例为依据,分析了将h指数和F1000两项指标纳入学术评价体系的可行性。

关 键 词:科学引文索引   基本科学指标   被引率
收稿时间:2014-07-10
修稿时间:2014-08-23

Correct Evaluation of Science Citation Index: Based on Guangzhou Medical University
ZHANG Ya-li. 2014. Correct Evaluation of Science Citation Index: Based on Guangzhou Medical University. Medicine & Philosophy, 35(10A): 8-11.
Authors:ZHANG Ya-li
Affiliation:Library of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510182, China
Abstract:Based on Guangzhou Medical University (GZMU), the article analyzed GZMU's total science citation index (SCI) papers, total citations, citations per paper,% document cited, highly cited papers, and hot papers, et al. It is found that the publication of SCI papers in GZMU has increased considerably in the last ten years. However, citations per paper, papers cited (% document cited), hot papers and papers highly cited are all lower than the global average. The conclusion showed that SCI must be used correctly, when we reviewed the academic productivity and influence of an institute or a person, the "citation count" should be paid more attention to than the "paper count". Meanwhile, not only SCI, but other evaluation factors, such as h index and F1000 can also be implied in academic evaluation system.
Keywords:science citation index  essential science indicators  the cited rate
点击此处可从《医学与哲学(人文社会医学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《医学与哲学(人文社会医学版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号