首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Not the same old hindsight bias: Outcome information distorts a broad range of retrospective judgments
Authors:Amy?Bradfield  author-information"  >  author-information__contact u-icon-before"  >  mailto:abradfie@bates.edu"   title="  abradfie@bates.edu"   itemprop="  email"   data-track="  click"   data-track-action="  Email author"   data-track-label="  "  >Email author,Gary?L.?Wells
Affiliation:Department of Psychology, Bates College, Lewiston, ME 04240, USA. abradfie@bates.edu
Abstract:The hindsight bias (e.g., Fischhoff, 1975) illustrates that outcome information can make people believe that they would have (or did) predict an outcome that they would not (or did not) actually predict. In two experiments, participants (N = 226) made a prediction immediately before receiving outcome information. Therefore, participants could not distort or misremember their predictions to make them align with the outcome information. In both experiments, participants distorted their reports of how certain they recalled having been in their prediction, how good of a basis they had for making the prediction, how long they took to make the prediction, and so forth. Experiment 2 showed that these effects were diminished when participants engaged in private thought about the upcoming questions prior to receiving outcome information, suggesting that the effect is not due to impression management concerns.
Keywords:
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号