Evidence of deontic reasoning in 3- and 4-year-old children |
| |
Authors: | Denise Dellarosa Cummins |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
|
| |
Abstract: | Deontic reasoning is reasoning about what one may, ought, or ought not do in a given set of circumstances. Virtually all of our social institutions and child-rearing practices presume the capacity to reason about deontic concepts, such as what is permitted, obligated, or prohibited. Despite this, very little is known about the development of deontic reasoning. Two experiments were conducted that contrasted children’s reasoning performance on deontic and indicative reasoning tasks (i.e., the reduced array selection version of the Wason card selection task). Like adults, children as young as 3 years of age were found to adopt a violation-detecting strategy more often when reasoning about the deontic case than when reasoning about the indicative case. These results indicate that violation detection emerges as an effective deontic reasoning very early in human development. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|