Conditional reasoning and conditionalization |
| |
Authors: | Liu In-mao |
| |
Affiliation: | Department of Psychology, National Chung-Cheng University, Chia-Yi, Taiwan. psyiml@ccunix.ccu.edu.tw |
| |
Abstract: | In solving conditional reasoning problems, reasoners are assumed to compute the probability of the conclusion, conditionalizing first on the categorical premise, giving the knowledge-based component, and conditionalizing then on the conditional-statement premise, from which the assumption-based component is derived. Because reasoners find it difficult to compute the second-step conditionalization except when the conditional-statement premise is found to be related to the result of the first-step conditionalization as for modus ponens or, possibly, for modus tollens, the knowledge-based component generally dominates reasoning performance. After representing all the possible cases in which conditional-argument forms may appear, this approach was found to be consistent with the results from the 3 experiments reported in this study, whereas 2 alternative hypotheses account for only some of the results. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|