Investigating How Test-Takers Change Their Strategies to Handle Difficulty in Taking a Reading Comprehension Test: Implications for Score Validation |
| |
Authors: | Amery D. Wu Michelle Y. Chen Jake E. Stone |
| |
Affiliation: | Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology and Special Education, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada |
| |
Abstract: | This article investigates how test-takers change their strategies to handle increased test difficulty. An adult sample reported their test-taking strategies immediately after completing the tasks in a reading test. Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling specifying a measurement-invariant, ability-moderated, latent transition analysis in Mplus (Muthén & Asparouhov, 2011). It was found that almost half of the test-takers (47%) changed their strategies when encountering increased task-difficulty. The changes were characterized by augmenting comprehending-meaning strategies with score-maximizing and test-wiseness strategies. Moreover, test-takers' ability was the driving influence that facilitated and/or buffered the changes. The test outcomes, when reviewed in light of adjusted test-taking strategies, demonstrated a form of process-based validity evidence. |
| |
Keywords: | test-taking strategy test-wiseness test-management latent class analysis latent transition analysis reading comprehension process-based validation response processes |
|
|