|
|||||
|
|
Reply to Patrick Hopkins |
|
| Authors: | Melinda Vadas |
| Abstract: | Patrick Hopkins has claimed that SM is compatible with feminist principles. I argue that his account relies on both mistaken analogies and an untenable account of the allegedly changed meaning of SM scenes. 1 1 The publication of this reply has not changed my view that Hypatia is ableist and is to that degree anti-feminist. |
| Keywords: | |