After-effects of responding and of withholding responses in C.RT tasks |
| |
Authors: | Patrick Rabbitt Margaret Clancy Subhash Vyas |
| |
Institution: |
a Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford |
| |
Abstract: | The effects of response repetition on choice RT were compared in b-reaction and in c-reaction tasks Experiments I(a) and I(b)]. The difference in RTs for repeated and for non-repeated responses was found to be less for c-reaction than for b-reaction tasks. This seemed to be because in c-reaction tasks subjects can prepare themselves to make the same response on every trial, so that there is little further RT reduction consequent on immediate response repetition. In b-reaction tasks subjects cannot always prepare to make the same response, so that the difference between response repetition RT and responce alteration RT is greater. Experiment II examined transitions between events in a serial, self-paced C.RT task in which subjects made a different response to each of two signals but withheld any response to the onset of a third. In this task responses were faster when they followed other, different responses than when they followed “no go” trials. The results of these experiments allow us to reject, even for very elementary tasks, a simple “S--R connection network” model for the processes involved in the identification of signals and the production of responses to them. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 InformaWorld 等数据库收录! |
|