Assessment Centers: Current Practices in the United States |
| |
| Authors: | Tasha L. Eurich,Diana E. Krause,Konstantin Cigularov,George C. Thornton Suffix" >III |
| |
| Affiliation: | (1) CH2M HILL, Englewood, CO 80112, USA;(2) Management and Organizational Studies, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, N6A 5C2, Canada;(3) Institute of Psychology, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL 60616-3793, USA;(4) Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA |
| |
| Abstract: | Purpose The goals of this investigation were to review current AC practices in the United States by evaluating whether they follow the Guidelines and Ethical Considerations for Assessment Center Operations (International Task Force on Assessment Centers, 2000). We both expanded upon and compared our results to a prior benchmarking study (Spychalski et al. in Personnel Psychol, 50:71–90, 1997), and investigated practices regarding job analysis, AC development, dimensions (i.e., job requirements), exercises, assessor characteristics and training, behavior recording, data integration, organizational policy, assessee rights, AC evaluation and AC technology. Data were collected via an online survey completed by individuals from human resource departments of organizations (N = 54) across the U.S; organizations to whom the survey was sent were selected by sampling Fortune 500 organizations based on economic sector. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录！ |
|
