首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

小学儿童学习时间分配决策水平的发展
引用本文:刘希平,方格.小学儿童学习时间分配决策水平的发展[J].心理学报,2005,37(5):623-631.
作者姓名:刘希平  方格
作者单位:1. 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室,北京,100101;天津师范大学教育科学学院,天津,300073
2. 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室,北京,100101
基金项目:本研究得到国家自然科学基金(30570613、30370490),国家科技部攀登计划项目(95-专-09),中国科学院重要方向项目(KSCXZ-SW-221)以及天津师范大学“中青年教师学术创新推进计划”项目(52WN02)的资助.
摘    要:利用自由回忆,线索回忆和再认三种提取方式,以儿童任务难度预见(EOL)的判断等级与学习时间分配之间的G相关值作为指标,考察了小学儿童学习时间分配决策水平的发展过程。小学2、4、6年级儿童和成人大学生(作为对照)参与本研究,每个年龄组各24人。主要研究结果表明:(1)总体而言,小学各年级儿童,其学习时间分配的决策都受对任务难度预见等级的制约,对EOL判断等级越高的项目,分配的学习时间越长,说明小学儿童具有一定程度的学习时间分配的决策能力;(2)在自由回忆条件下,小学4年级和小学6年级儿童对EOL的判断等级与学习时间之间的G相关值差异显著,表明儿童的决策水平由小学4年级到小学6年级表现出快速发展的趋势;(3)在线索回忆的条件下,小学2年级和4年级儿童G相关值有显著差异,表明决策水平由小学2年级到小学4年级之间有快速发展的趋势;(4)在再认的条件下,小学各年龄儿童学习时间分配的决策水平没有显著性差异,表明再认条件下小学阶段的决策水平进步不显著;(5)在三种提取方式下,小学儿童对任务难度预见判断等级与首次学习时间之间的G相关值都不同程度地低于与总的学习时间之间的相关值。这说明小学儿童在反复学习的过程中在不断调整自己的学习时间分配,调整的程度有随年龄增长而加大的趋势。小学6年级儿童在任务难度预见判断等级与学习时间之间的G相关值已接近成人水平。

关 键 词:任务难度的预见(EOL)  学习时间分配  G相关值  自控步调的学习
收稿时间:2004-06-13
修稿时间:2004年6月13日

Development of Children's Strategy on Allocation of Study Time
Liu Xiping,Fang Ge.Development of Children's Strategy on Allocation of Study Time[J].Acta Psychologica Sinica,2005,37(5):623-631.
Authors:Liu Xiping  Fang Ge
Institution:1 Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Belting 100101, China ;2 Department of Educational Science, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300073, China
Abstract:Adopted three kinds of retrieving means(free recall, clue recall, recognition), the current research explored development of children’s strategy on allocation of study time, with G correlation between ease-of-learning judgment and amount of study time. 72 subjects were from Grade 2, Grade 4, Grade 6 of Elementary School, and 24 from Grade 2 of University (as control group). Let Ss have an ease-of-learning judgment by arrangement all the learning items for their difficulty. Then had a self-paced study. The last step was retrieving. The results: 1) there is a relationship between the order of ease-of-learning judgment and the amount of self-paced study time, for all grades. That implicates even the students in elementary school, they could show the ability on allocation of study time; 2) G correlation of Grade 6 is much higher than Grade 4, for free recall, implicates that there is a tendency the level grows fastest between 4 and 6 grade; 3) G correlation of Grade 4 is much higher than Grade 2, for cue recall, seems means that there is a tendency that the level goes up fastest between 2 and 4 grade; 4) there are no reliable different on G correlation among three grades, for recognition, shows that there is no progress during the period of elementary school; and 5) G correlation between ease-of-learning judgment and amount of self-paced study time for the first trail is reliable lower than G correlation between ease-of-learning judgment and amount of self-regulated study time for all trails, whatever the retrieving mean is. The level of allocation of study time of Grade 6 is almost the same with one of adults.
Keywords:ease-of-learning judgment (EOL)  allocation of study time  Gcorrelation  self-paced study  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《心理学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《心理学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号