Emergent Readers' Recognition of Irony in Good Dog,Carl |
| |
Authors: | Joseph O. Milner Margie M. Milner |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Wake Forest University , Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA;2. Forsyth Medical Center , Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Jedediah Purdy's (2000) For common things laments the ironic mode of thought that characterizes our culture's mindset. He calls for a return to devotion, homage, and allegiance rather than what he sees as a jaundiced detachment that has overcome us. Purdy may be on to something, but Alexandra Day (1985) does not seem to adopt his call to a simpler way of seeing things. She encourages the ironic stance, even in young children. Her Good Dog, Carl may not be a thoroughly modern book; it is not a deconstructed child's text like David Weisner's (2001) The Three Pigs where the story falls apart, where we see reality and other texts invade the story world in amazing ways. But Day's Good Dog, Carl is a clever book that is filled with a basic irony that even 2- to 3-year-old children are beginning to understand and 5- to 6-year-olds are clearly recognizing. They catch the naughtiness of it, the rebellion that is always about to get underway. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|