Social interaction,observation, and stereotypes as determinants of differentiation in peer ratings |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Department of Neurology, United States;2. Department of Neurosurgery, Children''s Hospital New Orleans, LA, United States;3. Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Children''s Hospital New Orleans, LA, United States;4. Department of Neurology, Children''s Hospital New Orleans, LA, United States |
| |
| Abstract: | The goal of this investigation was to discover the relationships among peer rating items under three rating information conditions. One hundred British managers made peer ratings based on social interaction, observation, and sterotype information. These data were factor analyzed (using both simultaneous and independent factor solutions) to assess differentiation in each condition. By several criteria, ratings based on interaction were different from ratings based on observation or ratings based on stereotypes. A second set of data was submitted to an independent factor analysis to validate the reported findings. The results of initial and validation data are similar, though not, of course, identical. Implications for future research and behavior-based ratings are discussed. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
