首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

感数——它能告诉我们什么?
引用本文:徐晓东,刘昌.感数——它能告诉我们什么?[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(1):50-56.
作者姓名:徐晓东  刘昌
作者单位:南京师范大学认知神经科学实验室,南京 210097
基金项目:全国高等学校优秀博士学位论文作者专项基金;国家自然科学基金
摘    要:研究者在列举任务中发现,被试对3个以内项目的报告既快又准确(一般称之为“感数”),而对3个以上项目的报告既慢又容易出错误(“计数”),由此他们提出感数和计数属于两种不同性质的加工过程,一系列行为数据的反应时和正确率指标支持了这一假设。此外,最近的脑成像、电生理研究还发现,感数和计数在对注意的需求上同样存在着分离——感数无需注意,只有计数过程才需注意的参与。在此基础上,研究者从不同角度提出了一些解释感数现象的理论

关 键 词:感数  计数  注意  FINST理论  
文章编号:23683318
收稿时间:2006-4-17
修稿时间:04 17 2006 12:00AM

Subitizing, What Can It Tell Us
Xu Xiaodong,Liu Chang.Subitizing, What Can It Tell Us[J].Advances In Psychological Science,2007,15(1):50-56.
Authors:Xu Xiaodong  Liu Chang
Institution:Lab of Cognitive Neuroscience, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, 21009
Abstract:During the process of enumeration, researchers found that enumeration of three or fewer objects is very fast and accurate (often called “subitizing”), but gets slower and more error prone for more than three items (“counting”). Thereby they suggested that “subitizing” and “counting” are two qualitatively separable processes, a number of behavioral reaction time and accuracy supported their hypothesis. Moreover, recent neruoimage and electrophysiology results showed that “subitizing” and “counting” are also separable in attentional requirements. that is, “subitizing”can happen without attention, while “counting”must rely on attention. Based on these findings, many theories have been proposed to account for subitizing phenomenon
Keywords:subitizing  counting  attention  FINST theory  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《心理科学进展》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《心理科学进展》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号